Nonfiction horror

I do not read horror fiction. However, I have just read a horrifying nonfiction book. It’s Nuclear War: A Scenario, by Annie Jacobsen. It’s the scariest thing I’ve ever read

 Her premise is that North Korea launches an unprovoked attack on two U.S. sites: first, the Pentagon, and minutes later, the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in central California.

 Defensive missiles fired at the ICBM launched from North Korea miss their target. The missile fired from a North Korean submarine is too close to intercept. Missiles fired at North Korea in response must pass over Russia to get there. The Russians think they are being attacked and respond in kind. The American president, sidelined by overzealous protectors, is unable to intervene.

Within little more than an hour, almost all life on Earth is obliterated, and our world is plunged into a new ice age that will last thousands of years.

In a tense narrative of fewer than 300 pages, Jacobsen relates how the MAD doctrine of mutually assured destruction fails to prevent catastrophe, and elaborate systems created to assure safety are easily defeated.

Gripping from the start, it’s not an easy read. Some unnecessarily mind-numbing detail aside, Jacobsen wastes few words. The result is unthinkable – and yet, it is all too thinkable. The question is how we prevent it.

Jacobsen suggests that nuclear weapons are now the chief enemy of all humankind. But with psychopaths like Vladimir Putin of Russia and Kim Jong Un of North Korea in power, it seems unlikely that humans will unite against a common enemy when we can find so many other smaller enemies to battle. 

Confession and call

In our time of political division and fearmongering, a coalition of evangelical leaders have issued a call for prayer, worship and revival Sept. 8-15, 2024. 

The following “confession” is actually a call to action.

You’ll find the text and resources at this website: https://www.evangelicalconfession2024.com/

 I was alerted to it by a blog post by Kristin Du Mez, a historian who is best known for her book Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation.

 You can sign on in support of the effort if you wish. Du Mez notes that she is shy about such things, and I’m unclear whether she signed it or not.

 I also am shy about singing such things, but it did it anyway.

 Given that the term “evangelical” these days mostly means “conservative Republican, more or less semi-kinda some sorta Christian,” I am hesitant to put myself in that category.

 But I note that John Wesley, the founder of Methodism, considered himself and his followers evangelicals. And the name “evangelical” will never be restored to its best meaning until its current corruption is rooted out and deposited in the dustbin of history.

With that caveat, I am happy to help reclaim the name in the name of Jesus.

See what you think of the confession and call to action.

 Our Confession of Evangelical Conviction

 In this moment of social conflict and political division, we confess the following Christian convictions:

 ONE: We give our allegiance to Jesus Christ alone.

 We affirm that Jesus Christ is God's Son and the only head of the Church (Colossians 1:18). No political ideology or earthly authority can claim the authority that belongs to Christ (Philippians 2:9-11). We reaffirm our dedication to his Gospel which stands apart from any partisan agenda. God is clear that he will not share his glory with any other (Isaiah 42:8). Our worship belongs to him alone (Exodus 20:3-4), because our true hope is not in any party, leader, movement, or nation, but in the promise of Christ's return when he will renew the world and reign over all things (1 Corinthians 15:24-28).

We reject the false teaching that anyone other than Jesus Christ has been anointed by God as our Savior, or that a Christian's loyalty should belong to any political party. We reject any message that promotes devotion to a human leader or that wraps divine worship around partisanship.

TWO: We will lead with love not fear.

We affirm that God's saving power revealed in Jesus is motived by his love for the world and not anger (John 3:16). Because God has lavished his love upon us, we can love others (1 John 4:19). We acknowledge that this world is full of injustice and pain, but we are not afraid because Jesus Christ has promised to never abandon us (John 16:33). Unlike the false security promised by political idolatry and its messengers, the perfect love of God drives away all fear (1 John 4:18). Therefore, we do not employ fear, anger, or terror as we engage in our mission, but instead we follow the more excellent way of Jesus which is love (1 Corinthians 12:31-13:13).

We reject the stoking of fears and the use of threats as an illegitimate form of godly motivation, and we repudiate the use of violence to achieve political goals as incongruent with the way of Christ.

THREE: We submit to the truth of Scripture. 

We affirm that the Bible is the inspired Word of God, authoritative for faith and practice (2 Timothy 3:16-17). We commit to interpreting and applying Scripture faithfully, guided by the Holy Spirit, for the building up of Christ's people and the blessing of his world (John 16:13). We believe any true word of prophecy must align with the teachings of Scripture and the character of Jesus (1 John 4:1-3). Likewise, to lie about others, including political opponents, is a sin (Exodus 20:16). Therefore, we commit to speaking the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15), knowing deception dishonors God and harms the reputation of his Church.

We reject the misuse of holy Scripture to sanction a single political agenda, provoke hatred, or sow social divisions, and we believe that using God's name to promote misinformation or lies for personal or political gain is bearing his name in vain (Exodus 20:7).

FOUR: We believe the Gospel heals every worldly division.

We affirm the unity of all believers in Jesus Christ (Galatians 3:28), and that through his sacrificial death on the cross, he has removed the barriers that divide us (Ephesians 2:14-18), making people from every nation, tribe, people, and language into one new family (Revelation 7:9). We are called to be peacemakers (Matthew 5:9), and the counter-cultural unity of the Church is to be a sign to the world of God's love and power (John 13:35; 17:20-21).

We reject any attempt to divide the Church, which is the Body of Christ, along partisan, ethnic, or national boundaries, and any message that says it is God's desire for the human family to be perpetually segregated by race, culture, or ethnicity is a rejection of the Gospel.

FIVE: We are committed to the prophetic mission of the Church. 

We affirm that Christ's kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36), therefore the Church necessarily stands apart from earthly political powers so that it may speak prophetically to all people, the society, and governing authorities. The Church has been given a divine mission of reconciliation (2 Corinthians 5:18-21). First, we call everyone to be reconciled to God through the proclamation of the Gospel as we teach people everywhere to copy the way of Jesus (Matthew 28:19-20). Second, we seek to reconcile people to one another by addressing issues of justice, righteousness, and peace (Amos 5:24). We accomplish this by loving our neighbors (Mark 12:31), and by engaging our public life with humility, integrity, and a commitment to the common good as defined by our faith in Christ (Romans 12:18).

We reject both the call for the Church to withdraw from societal issues out of fear of political contamination, as well as any attempt to distort the Church into a mere vehicle of political or social power.

SIX: We value every person as created in God's image.

We affirm that all people bear God's image and possess inherent and infinite worth (Genesis 1:27). Jesus bestowed dignity upon those his culture devalued, and he taught us that our love, like God's, must extend even to our enemies (Matthew 5:43-48). Our faith in Christ, therefore, compels us to act with love and mercy toward all from the very beginning of life to the very end, and honor everyone as an image-bearer of God regardless of age, ability, identity, political beliefs, or affiliations (John 13:34-35). We commit ourselves to advocate for the value of everyone our society harms or ignores.

We reject any messages that employ dehumanizing rhetoric, that attempt to restrict who is worthy of God's love, or that impose limitations on the command to "love your neighbor" that Christ himself removed.

SEVEN: We recognize godly leaders by their character.

We affirm that the character of both our political and spiritual leaders matter. Within the Church, we seek to follow spiritual leaders those who display evidence of the Holy Spirit—love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control (Galatians 5:22-23). Jesus warned us to be on guard against false teachers who come as wolves in sheep's clothing (Matthew 7:15). These voices will tempt us with flattery, bad doctrine, and messages we want to hear (2 Timothy 4:3). They serve the false idols of power, wealth, and strength rather than the true God. Outside the Church, we will evaluate leaders based on their actions and the fruit of their character and not merely their promises or political success (Matthew 7:15-20). When any leader claims to have God's approval, whether in the Church or in politics, we will not confuse effectiveness for faithfulness, but carefully discern who is truly from God (1 John 4:1).

We reject the lie that a leader's power, popularity, or political effectiveness is confirmation of God's favor, or that Christians are permitted to ignore the teachings of Christ to protect themselves with worldly power.

Conclusion

We stand united in our confession of faith in Jesus Christ, resolved to uphold the truth of the Gospel in the face of political pressure and cultural shifts. We commit to being a light in the world (Matthew 5:14-16), and faithful witnesses to the transforming power of Christ's love. We pray that God’s Spirit will revive our Church and strengthen Christ's people to be agents of his presence and blessing in this turbulent age.

To him who is able to keep us from stumbling and to present us before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy— to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen. (Jude 1:24-25) 

Look away, patriots!

You’ve probably already formed an opinion about recent attempts to jam religious teaching into public schools. Whether you have or haven’t yet, here’s my take on plans to post the Ten Commandments in schools, and to force teaching of religion in the classroom.

 First, the Ten Commandments. The governor of Louisiana recently signed a law requiring them to be posted in every public school classroom in the state.

 The best case against this idea comes from someone who endorses it. That’s former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore.

 Remember him? He’s the judge who kept railing about “judicial activism” until, in a fit of judicial activism, he placed a two-ton granite statue featuring the Ten Commandments in front of the state court building, then disobeyed a federal judge’s order to remove it from public land, and then was removed from office.

He still bloviates about culture wars issues, and apparently some people still take him seriously. Here’s my take: If Moore loves an idea, you may suspect that it is seriously wrong.

The Louisiana law faces plenty of opposition, including lawsuits. Here is the response of the governor: “When you elect people, you elect them by a majority. That majority gets to rule. And so what I would say to those parents is that if those posters are in school, and they find them so vulgar, just tell the child not to look at it.”

That response is so wrong in so many ways it’s hard to know where to start. Let me skip to the worst part: “The majority gets to rule.” That means, of course, that those in the minority have no rights. Whatever the majority wants is what goes. This is the road to dictatorship.

And if you don’t like dictatorship, just don’t look. Pretend it’s not there.

What’s so wrong about posting the Ten Commandments in schools?

First, it’s an imposition of religion by the state. It’s a violation of the establishment clause of the First Amendment. It endorses and establishes a religion imposed by the state.

You may argue that the Ten Commandments are simply a list of basic moral rules. Really? Where do they come from? From Jewish scripture, adopted by Christians. Not from any other religious tradition. And the first four commandments are explicitly religious and have nothing to do with “moral” behavior beyond expected religious adherence.

By the way, the Bible contains two versions of the commandments – one in Exodus 20, the other in Deuteronomy 5. Oh, and they are closely mirrored by a third version in Leviticus 19.

Jews, Catholics and Protestants endorse slightly different versions of the Ten. Whichever version you prescribe, you create an establishment of religion that is banned by the Constitution.

Or at least it is until the “originalists” in the Supreme Court come up with an “original” opinion that they say follows exactly what the founders really, truly had in mind when they wrote the Constitution.

Whatever version you prescribe, does one of the commandments say not to “kill” or not to “murder”? Big difference. The original Hebrew says “murder.” But who’s an originalist now?

Anyway, what’s wrong with putting a little morality in the classroom? What’s wrong is that we know that whoever “rules” will try to enforce a very strict (and, dare we say, partisan) morality that, in fact, violates the spirit of the Ten Commandments.

How about a little gospel instead of chiseled-in-stone law? How about posting the text of Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount in schools? That won’t pass constitutional muster either, of course. But wouldn’t you like to hear any red state governor proposing anything like that? Ever read what Jesus said? Yikes!

I have not forgotten to comment on the teaching of religion in the classroom. It is hard to imagine Louisiana, or any other state inclined to require this, to set up any system that guards against intentional abuse by “Christian” nationalists and fundamentalists.

Rather, they will actually invite such abuse. Because both these efforts have nothing to do with religion or morality in the schools. They’re simply stealth attacks on public education in general. The idea is to make public education impossible, so that private, sectarian, partisan education can prevail – funded by everyone, of course, because the majority rules.

And you can’t just not look at it.

An extra-Oord-inary verdict

Name a notable Church of the Nazarene theologian.

 Think about it awhile if you like.

 Ray Dunning and Mildred Wynkoop come to mind. They’re among my faves, too.

 Any others?

 Especially, any who are alive?

 How about Thomas Jay Oord?

 Nice try. See, he just got drummed out of the church. Like, totally. He’s not even Nazarene anymore. He’s former Nazarene now.

 Why? Because he championed the inclusion of LGBTQ+ folks. What’s worse, he actually tried to get the church to change its position on their inclusion.

 Heresy and worse, a Nazarene court ruled the other day.

 A church court not only stripped Oord of his preaching credentials. It actually expelled him from membership in the denomination.

 Excommunicated him. De-fellowshipped him. All but pronounced a holy curse on him.

 Members of his local church in Nampa, Idaho, have no intention of enforcing this action. Lord knows what the denominational bigwigs will do to them.

 Oord was found guilty of “conduct unbecoming a minister” because he taught “doctrines out of harmony with the doctrinal statement of the Church of the Nazarene.”

 You see, the Church of the Nazarene officially holds that “the practice of same-sex sexual intimacy is contrary to God’s will.”

 One piece of evidence the court cited was a book Oord wrote with his daughter Alexa, Why the Church of the Nazarene Should Be Fully LGBTQ+ Affirming.

 Oord is sad about the verdict but not surprised (though he hadn’t expected the unprecedented expulsion from the church). “I had hoped the Church of the Nazarene could be a place for me and those like me who fully affirm queer people and support their allies.”

Forget about it.

Understand that Oord was not found guilty of denying any doctrine about salvation, or the Father, Son or Holy Spirit.

Nope. Nothing like that. He was found guilty of opposing church doctrine about sex.

Sex counts more than anything else these days in some churches.

Among Southern Baptists, for example. Or Global Methodists.

But no more among United Methodists, thank God.

We United Methodists have our problems, for sure. But we don’t worship sex.

Tell me these other folks don’t. Cause they sure act like they do.

I have read several of Oord’s books. He is a process theologian. I read most process theology with interest but not much agreement. I find Oord a challenging as well as interesting read, and I think he’s right, or close to right, much of the time.

Happily, I don’t belong to a church where you have to be “right” about sex all the time.

Images good and bad

Religious-theme controversies hither and yon:

 ·       Score one for the Apaches. And the image of Christ!

 For 35 years, the 8-foot-tall image of an Apache Christ hung behind the altar of St. Joseph Apache Mission in Mescalaro, New Mexico.

 The icon was created by Franciscan friar Robert Lentz in 1989. It depicts Christ as a Mescalero medicine man. It is a visually stunning reminder that Christ comes to us in many guises in all cultures.

 I have a postcard version of the icon that I have treasured for more than 20 years.

 A month ago, the people of the church were shocked when they showed up for worship and saw that the icon was gone. So were other art works that mixed Christian and Apache themes.

The priest said he had removed the “pagan” images to avoid corrupting the people.

Apparently he preferred the usual (non-corrupting) European images of Christ that appear in most Catholic artwork.

The priest said the local bishop and other diocesan officials had approved of the art’s removal.

Church people threw a fit. Then something truly momentous happened. The bishop backed down. He removed the priest, returned the artworks and apologized (as much as bishops ever really apologize for anything).

*  *  *  *  * 

·       Some people are really upset about the Last Supper “parody” during the opening ceremonies of the Olympics in Paris.

Problem is, the scene was not a portrayal of the Last Supper It was a portrayal of the Feast of Dionysus, the ancient Greek god of wine and orgies. No wonder it was so ribald. Oh, those French!

And, oh those (primarily Americans) who were so quick to take offense!

I missed seeing the whole thing first-hand. I watched about ten minutes of the parade, saw a few boats carrying athletes down the Seine, yawned and quit in boredom.

*  *  *  *  * 

·       Some people claim that God “spared” Donald Trump from assassination when a bullet nicked his ear.

If you follow the logic of that, then God directed bullets to kill firefighter Corey Comperatore and seriously injure two other bystanders at the Trump rally.

Or maybe Trump just moved his head at the right time.

Or maybe the shooter was just a bad shot.

You really ought to be careful assigning divine motive to bullets. It makes God the author of an awful lot of pain.

But if you must believe that God “spared” Trump, then the next time something awful happens to you, you must accept the notion that God did it to you, on purpose, because you so richly deserved it.

Relax. God doesn’t work that way.

Because if any of us God what we deserve, we’d all be in a terrible fix, wouldn’t we?